Body Scanners Check Your Underwear
Let’s see now; the idiot shoe bomber got on an American international flight, and as a result, we all have to remove our shoes as part of security screening. Then, we had the would-be suicide bomber who was going to mix chemicals on board to create a bomb, and as a result we all must separate our lotions and potions, putting them in a separate Zip-lock bag of precisely one-quart size and with no item of more than 100ml. One of these days, a would-be terrorist is going to try the deed while wearing chemical-soaked clothing, so I guess we can expect to be required to strip to the buff for security screening.
But chances are we will never see an “underwear bomber”. It’s proven that you can’t pack enough explosives in even the most generous women’s underwear to bring down a jetliner anyway. So why should we be checking the genitals of millions of passengers, when they will just blow up the security line, the train, a bus, or something easier to do?
All that we will accomplish is to alienate the traveling public and put a few airlines out of business – Invasion of the Full-Body Scanners
If we today had the courage demonstrated by our forebearers, when we arrived at the scanning machine and took off our shoes, etc, we would just strip down to the buff, and walk through. Having thousands of travellers in the buff at multiple airports across the land would put an end to this insanity very quickly.

by Wimpie
15 Jun 2010 at 22:34
Let me get this right.
2 million passengers per day (in the US only) for the past 9 years (since 9/11) equals about 6.5 BILLION passengers.
One nut tries to blow up a plane with explosives in his underwear which failed. (BTW: You can’t put enough explosives in your underwear to down a plane) and now OUR GOVERNMENT want to strip search or physically pat down all AMERICAN travelers at a cost of billions of dollars. WTF?
Nobody has been killed by terrorists on an American aircraft since 9/11!
Odds: 1 in 6.5 billion ? or less? the bombs didn’t work!
Powerball 1 in 40 million?
State lottery 1 in 14 million.
I’m 162 times more likely to win the state lottery, than to be killed by terrorists on a plane!
WHAT ARE OUR LEGISLATORS SMOKING?
What about the 300,000 killed in car crashes in the same period?
What’s wrong with this picture? Anybody see it like me?
Join us on Facebook:
All Facebook Against Airport Full Body Scanners
14,000 members
by Traveller from kent
16 Jun 2010 at 15:57
Quite an issue, but it will only be a major airports when it does eventually kick in to the full degree anyway i think. I definitley don’t like the idea, but if we want to travel abroad by plane and these are the rules, we either have to get used to it or find another way to travel. I personally like boats
by me
21 Jul 2010 at 09:25
Quote: “But chances are we will never see an “underwear bomber”.”
Perhaps you missed the “underwear bomber” attempt on X-mas 2009.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/12/28/us/28explosives.html
That said, I do think that the full body scanners are a complete violation, of person, privacy and rights. If you have the option for a pat down/normal screening, then they are acceptable for those who don’t care.
There are far more serious vulnerabilities that expose the US and other countries to attack, plane attacks are high profile but rarely successful in comparison to other types of bombings/attacks. When are trains, buses and general building/skyscraper securities going to be up to the level that seems to be required to fly? Far more people are located in a skyscraper or passenger train than an airplane.
I’m waiting for the scanner proof underwear to hit the market.
by missy
18 Mar 2011 at 05:14
Why don’t we just travel nude and no luggage at all? And excuse me, try to check my underwear and they will see stars right in front of their eyes if they do that. What the heck? Let them put bombs on their vital parts, who care, they will just blow their bodies into the whole plain. If its not stupidity and being an idiot I don’t know what to call it.
by Karma Havener
03 Oct 2011 at 06:25
Yes, the underwear bomber. It’s terriable. I woudl lke airport scan all the passengers rather than another 911 happen. Just my thought.
Karma Havener´s last [type] ..Bed and Breakfast resources
by Joe Anderson
22 Nov 2011 at 03:14
And yet we put up with restrictions from the government on everything we do on a daily basis. I don’t really get what everyones’ big issue with the increasing security on airports is. If your son died on an airplane, you’d be singing the opposite tune in no time.